1 pr. L, 1 pr. M, 1 pr. S - EarFIlls silicone sleeves
2 pr. L, 2 pr. M - ComfortFit foam sleeves
1 Loop cleaning tool
I gotta tell ya, the Atrio has
the baddest low end of anything I've ever
heard. I had UM2's on my bass player in my week end band. I asked him to
give these a try. Boomer's a 55 year old player that has been around the
block. He put in the Atrio and started pounding on the open low B. He
looked up at me and said, Now thats what I'm talkin about. Boomer
just walked away beating on that open low B.
For ipod, computer, and mp3
players - this is my only choice - again, nothing I've heard comes close.
I prefer the Atrio over the more expensive Westone 3.
The Atrio seats deeply in your ear. When they are seated
correctly you’ll achieve isolation just like a mold and the sound is in the sweet
spot every time (no moving the IEM around trying to hear where it sounds best).
Here I’d usually say bang for
the buck but that wouldn’t be accurate. I’ll go as far as saying if the Atrio
cost $299 I’d still recommend it.
Here’s
a review written by Martin Sägmüller. I found this after writing for an
hour trying to do my own. Martin covers all the basses well. Hat’s off
to the guy’s writing ability. Here ya go:
Future
Sonics, self-proclaimed innovators of in-ear monitoring (IEM) phones
some twenty years ago, hit the market with two universal-fit IEMs, the
Atrio M5 in black and the M8 in blue.
Future
Sonics isn't a company with a big advertising budget; they keep a low
profile. However, their phones are quite well known among professional
musicians and audio technicians. Artists like Madonna, Sonic Youth, U2,
and Luciano Pavarotti use custom-built Future Sonics ear monitors on
stage. Now the universal-fit Atrio series offers a glimpse of the
Future Sonics sound - without the need of having ear impressions made
by an audiologist and (most importantly) without dropping almost a
thousand bucks for them.
Future
Sonics is very vocal about their usage of traditional single dynamic
driver technology in their products, similar to the ones found in most
full-sized headphones. This approach is the polar opposite to almost
all other high-end IEM manufacturers who use multiple balanced armature
drivers, the tiny drivers commonly used in hearing aids. We'll see if
Future Sonics are on the right path, and if a single dynamic driver IEM
can take on the masses of balanced armature IEMs out there.
Design/Comfort
They
might not win a beauty contest in all their plastic glory, but they're
designed to do their job well. Build quality seems solid enough, though
there's nothing outstanding to report about it. The housing is all
plastic; the stem where the cables enter the phones is rubberized. This
might improve comfort, but those rubber parts are rather hard-to-clean
lint magnets. Memory wires are attached to the rubber stem - thin wires
in a transparent tube, which keep the shape they're bent, to go over
the ears - for improved comfort and reduced cable microphonics. These
cable noises, which are often quite obnoxious and distracting on many
cheaper IEMs, are quite well tamed on the Atrios.
The
cables are a bit thin side, but they feel sturdy. The only possible
downside in the construction is that they're not user replaceable like
on the Ultimate Ears IEMs. If the Atrio's cables snap or get damaged,
the phones have to be sent back to Future Sonics for repair. However,
the company is well regarded for good customer service, so this might
not be a big issue. If you buy phones for $200, you will probably be
more careful than with the $5 stock earbuds that came with your player,
anyway.
The
large variety of silicone and foam sleeves comes with the Future Sonics
for a reason. They're deep in-ear phones, not canal phones like the
Sennheiser CX300 or the V-Moda Vibes. Unlike with many of these phones
that sit on the outside of the ear canals, it is of utmost importance
to get the right seal with the Atrios - otherwise they don't sound
nearly as good as they should. It is quite obvious when the right seal
is achieved and the bass response achieves full impact. Some trial and
error might be involved until the perfect fit is found, but that's all
part of the deep IEM game.
On
a side note, many people recommend using Shure's newly designed black
foam tips with the Atrios instead of the stock ones from Future Sonics.
They should isolate even more, have better durability, and are more
hygienic since they're washable due to their smooth surface. The Future
Sonics' porous skin-colored foam tips start to get quite gross after a
week of usage.
For
me, the Atrio sounds like a totally different phone when I use them
with either the silicone or the foam sleeves. Both variants can provide
a proper seal and decent comfort. However, for my ears the foam tips
sound a bit darker and more rolled off in the treble region than the
silicone tips. It is easier for me to achieve a proper seal with the
foam tips than with the silicone ones, but the silicones give me better
bass response - your mileage may vary. It's a matter of taste, and it's
fun to experiment finding one's own sound - and comfort - preference.
The Atrios are chameleons regarding the sound character, a detail that
makes them even more interesting.
Comfort
is an important factor when wearing the Atrios for a long time. I got
used to their quite "intrusive" design rather fast, and now I can even
wear them while sleeping. When I'm on the go, I almost forget I have
them shoved that deep down my ear canals. These phones certainly are no
fashion accessory, but they are built to deliver truly great
tweakability, isolation, and comfort.
Contrary
to the recent hype about IEMs with two or three balanced armature
drivers (the type of drivers also used in hearing aids) as found in
Shure, Westone, or Ultimate Ears phones, Future Sonics stays true to
their roots and only builds phones with a single dynamic driver.
Dynamic drivers have a wider frequency range than balanced armatures,
and a single-driver design does not need crossover electronics built
into the phone. Complicated designs and multiple drivers can reduce
sound quality due to the additional signal paths, next to under- or
over-emphasized spots around the crossover frequencies, where the bass,
mid, and treble frequencies overlap. "More" doesn't necessarily mean
"better", according to Future Sonics. Seeing my impressions of the
Atrio's sound quality below, Future Sonics certainly may be on to
something with their attitude...
I
verified the Atrio's frequency response - indeed they do go down to
20Hz, and the bass starts hitting heavy and almost blurring my vision
at about 28Hz. Of course I can't hear if they actually go up to 20kHz,
but nothing is missing in the treble regions of the recordings I
listened to. 32 Ohm impedance is a bit higher than many other in-ear
phones. Therefore the Atrios might not be quite as loud as some other
IEMs, but they have a lot less background hiss with some portable
players.
The
noise attenuation claims also seem to be right. They isolate a lot more
than most other non-custom in-ear phones (depending on a proper fit, of
course). The Atrio's cables also deliver the promised "low
microphonics" - they're far less annoying on the go than many other
in-ear phones.
Sound Quality
No
matter what style of music or input source, the Atrios sound great to
my ears. Be it jazz, reggae, drum 'n bass, rock, or metal, they deliver
the sound with quality and refinement. There's no need for dropping
names of artists or bands, no need to describe what instruments sound
the best with the Atrios - they perform exceptionally well with every
audio material you throw at them. Simple as that.
There's
also not very much difference in sound quality when connecting them to
a weaker portable player like the Cowon X5 or a full-blown tube
amplifier like the Woo Audio 6. Of course, as is the case with almost
any phone, the Atrios benefit from a stronger amp, making them even
more dynamic and punchy. But there's absolutely nothing to complain
about when using the Atrios with the weak amp on a portable audio
player. After all, Future Sonics phones are meant for on-stage
monitoring and most performers don't carry amps with 110/220V plugs on
their backs.
Bass
response is excellent: it goes deep and is very articulated. Pitch and
texture of bass frequencies are presented very well. The Atrios have
quite a bit more bass than Shures or Etymotics, but the bass does not
overwhelm the mids; it doesn't make the overall sound muddy in any way.
Contrary to bloated bass-monster IEMs like the Super.Fi 5 EB or the
CX300, the Atrios can be seen as the "bass reference" for IEMs. They're
still IEMs, not full-sized headphones, so the bass doesn't go quite as
deep as, for example, on Beyerdynamic DT 770s or Sennheiser HD 650s.
But considering the size of the drivers inside the Atrios, they're
about as good as it gets without being anemic like Etymotic or cheaper
Shure models or bloated or muddy like the Super.Fi EB or CX300.
The
midrange is very slightly recessed, but still very clear and detailed.
The mids are great for voices, male and female alike; they sound very
human, not as artificial as with balanced armature drivers. The
midrange reminds me more of full-sized Sennheiser or Beyerdynamic
headphones than of the usual IEMs, which is a very good thing. All the
details are there. Nothing seems to be missing from the main parts of
the music. Everything is very dynamic and punchy, both in the micro and
macro structures of the audio material.
The
treble is slightly rolled off, but doesn't lack any details or clarity
either. The Atrios do appear to be "dark" sounding phones compared to
some balanced armature IEMs, like the Shures or Etymotics, but that
makes them easier to listen to for my ears. I can wear them for hours
without getting any listening fatigue, contrary to ultra-bright
balanced armature IEMs. They have no sibilance at all; they're really
smooth. The Shures and Etymotics do have a bit more precision and
clarity in the treble regions, but for me the Atrios sound more
natural, relaxed, and enjoyable.
Soundstage
is quite good, considering the Atrios are in-ear phones with the
drivers sitting very close to the ear drums. It's not a
three-dimensional experience as on some large, open headphones, but it
leaves most of the in-ear competition far behind. Ultimate Ears
Super.Fi, Etymotics, or most others don't have any soundstage at all:
all of the sound is inside your head. The Atrios can go quite a bit
more to the left and right, front and back of your head. The only other
IEM I know with a similar soundstage is the V-Moda Vibe, but this one
uses an open design, which is a much easier approach to create a
realistic soundstage.
Many
in-ear phones perform quite badly at lower volume settings. They need
to be turned up to dangerously high levels to sound good. Not so with
the Atrios: they get the sound right even on very quiet listening
levels, especially the bass response. Some details are lost, of course,
but overall they still sound satisfying.
Fans
of overly bright balanced armature IEMs (or of Grado or AKG headphones)
might not like the Atrios that much, but for people used to the
higher-end Sennheiser HD series signature sound or even the V-Moda
Vibes, the Future Sonics Atrio M5 might very likely be the right thing.
Like
with most dynamic driver phones, it is advisable to let the Atrios
"burn in" for some time. Just let them play some music or pink noise
overnight and listen in on the next day. Don't judge their sound right
out of the box. Their sonic characteristics might change in the first
20 to 50 hours of usage. In the first hours they might sound harsh or
boomy, but this settles down after a while.
One
last thing: do yourself a favor and do not listen to 128kbps MP3s with
these phones. They deserve better quality input. It's worthwhile to
invest some time in upgrading your music collection to a higher bitrate
to match the sonic abilities of the Atrios.
Conclusion
Without
a doubt, the Future Sonics Atrios are my favorite in-ear monitors at
the moment. No other IEMs I know of do so much right and so little
wrong. They're not the most "pedantic" phones out there, but they're
the most musical ones for my tastes. Almost like good full-sized
headphones, they make the sound really enjoyable and they get my feet
tapping no matter what style of music I'm listening to. They are punchy
and precise without being fatiguing; they are quite spacious and still
isolate a lot. The Future Sonics Atrio M5 are not the cheapest in-ear
monitors around, but they're far from being the most expensive ones you
can find. They're worth every penny, and they give the
double/triple/quadruple balanced armature IEMs a run for their money.
Highly recommended for people who love to listen to the music instead
of analyzing single sine waves.
Pros
·Great sound quality, clarity, and resolution across the whole frequency spectrum
·Decent soundstage for an in-ear phone
·Good audio quality even at low volume settings
·Great isolation from outside noise
·Very little microphonics and cable noise
·Comfortable for a phone that goes quite deep into the ear canal
Cons
·Somewhat difficult to insert and remove; sound quality depends a lot on getting a good seal in the ear canal
·Sound signature might be too dark for some tastes - at least for people accustomed to very bright-sounding phones
·No user-replaceable cable
All Packages includes:
1 pr. Future Sonics Atrio®
1 Contoured Carrying case
1 pr. L, 1 pr. M, 1 pr. S - EarFIlls™ silicone sleeves
2 pr. L, 2 pr. M - ComfortFit™ foam sleeves
1 Loop cleaning tool
Perfect for Stage, Studio, Broadcast and personal digital media players (Apple iPhone® requires adapter)
ALL SHIPPING COST BELOW ARE FOR ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD
Atrio Model M3 Beige
Atrio Model M5 Black
Atrio Model M8 Blue
Atrio Model M9 Ruby Red
Mike Volkerding Office- 513-751-0970 / Cell - 513-375-3302 or email mike@freqcitysound.com